Tuesday, October 30, 2012
Ad
http://wellmedicated.com/inspiration/50-inspiring-vintage-advertisements/
This ad is using rhetoric to convince its intended audience (younger men) that by wearing these Career Club shirts they will be better dancers. Both the man and the woman appear to be having an absolutely great time and it is because of his orange shirt. This ad sends the message that by wearing this shirt, you're going to have a lot more fun than if you were to wear a different shirt brand.
I like how they also give directions on how to do the "skate". "Skate right, clap hands...Skate left...Shake shoulders, roll hands.." Epic.
I also find it funny that although the shirt is a Career shirt, they are encouraging that the man wearing it go out and "cut loose" on the dance floor. And in the lower fine print it reads "Career Club tapered shirts in cotton...Get free dance booklet at your Career Club dealer." So not only are they selling shirts, but "sophisticated" dance moves as well.
Monday, October 29, 2012
Visual Rhetoric Article
Visual Rhetoric, Photojournalism, and Democratic Public Culture
John Louis Lucaites and Robert Hariman
Rhetoric Review
,
Vol. 20, No. 1/2 (Spring, 2001), pp. 37-42
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/466134
I found this article to actually be pretty interesting and helpful when looking at visual rhetoric. The author quotes that "visual rhetoric refers to a large body of visual and material practices, from architecture to cartography and from interior design to public memories." Mostly this article was about how iconic photographs are used to summarize and represent the state of "specific conceptions of civic identity that have developed as key features of liberal-democratic polity."
I found this article to actually be pretty interesting and helpful when looking at visual rhetoric. The author quotes that "visual rhetoric refers to a large body of visual and material practices, from architecture to cartography and from interior design to public memories." Mostly this article was about how iconic photographs are used to summarize and represent the state of "specific conceptions of civic identity that have developed as key features of liberal-democratic polity."
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Monday, October 22, 2012
Rhetoric
In Grant-Davie's article, he quotes Bitzer's definition of a rhetorical situation where "the context in which speakers or writers create rhetorical discourse." My example of using rhetorical discourse comes from my WRIT 371 course that I took this past summer. We had to create a multi-model project where our audience was the class. For this, I focused on an issue that all my classmates could easily relate too: How the internet and social media sources influence our learning and education. I focused my argument around the different uses for blogs, Facebook, and email. Each of these are used to present information to an audience, each for a specific reason. Blogs can focus on any topic, and and be as long or short as the author would like, whereas Facebook statues are generally short and to the point, and emails can be as formal or informal depending on the authors audience.
My project can be viewed at http://jwilsonwrit371.blogspot.com/2012/06/critical-photo-essay.html
For this project, audience was the main focus and how the author, depending on the presentation of the information, focused on addressing the issues they were discussing.
My project can be viewed at http://jwilsonwrit371.blogspot.com/2012/06/critical-photo-essay.html
For this project, audience was the main focus and how the author, depending on the presentation of the information, focused on addressing the issues they were discussing.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
That's Debatable.
While watching the debate, I found myself paying more attention to the candidates body movements and facial expressions than what was actually being said. It was humorous to watch the reaction of the candidate who wasn't speaking while the other one rambled off on some tangent, making sure to point out their opponents flaws, lies, etc. The sitting candidate would laugh, shake their head, and sometimes even interrupt if there was an immediate correction that needed to be made. I think that they were more relaxed this time in order to give a personal feeling to their direct audience.
I also liked how they would make sure to greet and welcome each audience member that asked a question by name. This definitely makes the audience member feel more welcomed and appreciated, giving them a sense respect, rather than just being another member in the audience.
Romney did a good job, and was persistent in correcting Obama in his statements. I think this has a powerful effect on the audience because it shows that he's not just going to sit back and let Obama incorrectly represent his campaign.
Obama's closing statement with the 47% comment was DEFINITELY planned. I'm sure he was instructed to save this comment for the very end (I don't think he mentioned it any other time) because that is what America would be left with.
The most frustrating thing for me during the debate was how BOTH candidates would speak minutes after their clock-timer had run out. I know that they have a lot they want to say, and also clear up but come on! I don't know how the mediator does it...
Speaking of the mediator, she definitely over stepped her boundaries when she commented on the Libya terrorists attacks by agreeing with Obama. It brought her into the debate more than she should've been.
Romney seemed to have done a good job at explaining and justifying his plans for the future of America and how he would help the economic status we are currently in. To me, Obama just focused on what he's done during his four years, not really elaborating on what he would do differently if he were to be re-elected again.
I also liked how they would make sure to greet and welcome each audience member that asked a question by name. This definitely makes the audience member feel more welcomed and appreciated, giving them a sense respect, rather than just being another member in the audience.
Romney did a good job, and was persistent in correcting Obama in his statements. I think this has a powerful effect on the audience because it shows that he's not just going to sit back and let Obama incorrectly represent his campaign.
Obama's closing statement with the 47% comment was DEFINITELY planned. I'm sure he was instructed to save this comment for the very end (I don't think he mentioned it any other time) because that is what America would be left with.
The most frustrating thing for me during the debate was how BOTH candidates would speak minutes after their clock-timer had run out. I know that they have a lot they want to say, and also clear up but come on! I don't know how the mediator does it...
Speaking of the mediator, she definitely over stepped her boundaries when she commented on the Libya terrorists attacks by agreeing with Obama. It brought her into the debate more than she should've been.
Romney seemed to have done a good job at explaining and justifying his plans for the future of America and how he would help the economic status we are currently in. To me, Obama just focused on what he's done during his four years, not really elaborating on what he would do differently if he were to be re-elected again.
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Presidential Rhetoric - Part 1
Women and their role in the
upcoming campaign have become an important aspect to the candidates when seeking
votes. In the 2008 elections 10 million
more women voted than men, making their voting decisions more important than in
any election ever before. The issues
that have been the most important to women voters are those concerning health
concerns such as birth control and abortion rights, as well as issues
concerning supporting a family and feeding their children. The candidates of
the campaign have taken notice to the important, possibly deciding role that
women will play in the upcoming November elections, as “this campaign has been
marked by an unusual intensity of debate over women’s issues, particularly
reproductive rights (Riccardi).”
Obama is a huge fan of using the
media to attract and recruit the younger generation of voters. He uses accounts on Twitter and Tumblr to
have access to all those who are accessing social media sources at an almost
constant rate. Often, Obama uses these
accounts to update followers with campaign issues, such as the important subjects
concerning women and women issues. While
some advertisements have gained successful popularity among women voters, other
ads have caused uproar and backlash. The
ethos, pathos, and logos of each determine how the intended audience reacts to
the piece of advertisement.
In the picture shown below, Obama
gives the audience the impression of a strong and concerned man. Although his face is stern, it gives off the
fatherly expression which shows compassion and understanding, rather than that
of an all-knowing dictator who would tell a woman what she could or couldn’t do
with her body. By doing this, he is establishing an ethos that makes him
relatable to women, as well as to fathers who are concerned about their
daughter’s well-being. More ethos is
also created with this image and statement for those who know Obama has two
daughters of his own, as well as a wife.
In the statement, “Women are not an
interest group. They are mothers, and
daughters, and sisters, and wives. They
are half of this country and they are perfectly capable of making their own
choices about their health,” Obama begins with generalizing women together as a
whole. This strategy of pathos, by
banding women together, sends the message that all women are in this fight
against health care together. With the
next words “…are not an interest group,” he addresses the issue that all women
are not the same; not raised the same, educated the same, or have the same
access to medical care, so they should not all be grouped into one definitive
group. The breaking down of the
different generations and relations of women as individual human beings
solidifies his message that all women should be treated equally, but on
individual terms and bases. This creates
a strong sense of pathos for all ages of women who come from all different
types of backgrounds, which gives the sense of empowerment individually, as
well as a whole.
“They are half of this country and
are perfectly capable of making their own choices about their health” puts the
power and credibility into the hands of the women as voters. This is meant to make the women feel as if
they are now in control of their own health care and personal choices, and that
Obama is there to help. This is
effective because it sends the message that Obama believes that they do not
need instruction from him or his campaign, or anybody else when it comes to
their personal health choices.
This statement that was posted on
Obama’s Twitter account has a very clear and gender-specific audience – women. The effectiveness of posting this to Twitter
is an obvious attempt to attract the younger audience who will see it and share
it with others more so than if he would’ve stated it in a speech or discussed
it on a late-night talk show visit. How it was presented to the audience shows
that Obama and his campaign believe that younger voters will relate to this
style of advertising and find it more effective to address the issues
concerning them in a social-media centered fashion.
The ethos that is established in
this post is made believable because it comes from President Obama,
himself. Which many voters, and
tweeters, find to be an extremely credible course without much, if any,
question. Emotion and pathos play an important
role in the message of this Tweet because it is centered on women and the issue
that has become most important to many of them.
When Obama says that, “The decisions…they’re up to you,’ the image of
Uncle Sam pointing his finger in recruitment is hard to suppress. “You” is a
very powerful statement because it individualizes each and every reader, rather
than summarizing them as whole and saying “they’re up to women”. If “women”
were to replace “you” a less powerful message would have been sent to the
readers. The “you” individualizes each
reader, each woman, sending an empowering message that suggests, again, that
she is in control.
The picture shown below was
reportedly posted to the official Obama campaign Tumblr page.
Although the Obama campaign claims
to be highly supportive of women and their bodies, the posting of this
advertisement suggests otherwise. This
card is using mostly pathos to address the issues concerning women’s rights to
abortion and contraception in a very brief and “dumbed-down” way. Its target, young women voters between the
ages 18-25, are being encouraged to “vote with their body parts” rather than
with their own intelligence.
The image of the young girl to the
right gives the image of enthusiasm as she raises her hand in support to the
statement that is to the left of her.
This perceives the notion of a woman who really doesn’t have a clear
understanding of what she is voting for and saying “yes” to. The only thing that suggests she understands
what she is voting for is the fact her legs are closed and crossed as if
protecting her “lady parts.”
The logos behind this image and its
posting was meant to be humorous and
appealing to the younger audience that Obama is always trying to impress with a
relatable, friendly appearance. Because
it was on his Tumblr account and not on a national news stations website, the
lax, entertaining piece of media gave the appearance of Obama and his campaign
to be taking women and their issues less seriously than had been previously expressed.
The sloppy appearance of the woman and
the belittling statement she is posed for sends a disturbing message (enthymeme)
to the women who viewed the page and saw the post: a woman should vote solely
based on her gender and the body parts it came with.
Women who saw the ad responded saying that the "statement was misogynistic, and they plan on voting with their brains...also pointing out that abortions aren't really in their gender's best interest, especially when those abortions are sex-selective. (Hamilton)"
These three images used by the
Obama campaign use different methods (and sometimes a combination of) logos,
pathos, and ethos, with the intent of influencing and encouraging the voters to
believe in Obama and his beliefs.
Although some are more popular than others, they are all effective in
using convincing messages to sway the audience towards Obama, or frighten them
away with fear for their body parts.
Works cited
Hamilton,
Amelia. “Obama campaign removes ‘vote like your ladies parts depend on it.’” Red Alert Politics. N.p. 2 Oct. 2012.
Web. 2 Oct. 2012. <http://redalertpolitics.com/2012/10/02/obama-campaign-removes-vote-like-your-lady-parts-depend-on-it-tumblr-post-after-conservative-backlash/>.
“Riccardi,
Nicholas. “Women’s Vote Battle Defines 2012 Presidential Election.” Huffington Post. N.p. 27 Aug. 2012. Web.
2 Oct. 2012. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/27/womens-vote-2012-election_n_1832825.html>
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Notes for myself
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/27/womens-vote-2012-election_n_1832825.html
http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/08/29/ann-romney-chris-christie-declare-war-for-the-womens-vote-in-election-2012/
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/highway-2012/campaign-2012-todd-akin-war-on-women-stupid
http://usconservatives.about.com/od/thinkersanddoers/p/Ann-Romney-2012-Game-Changer.htm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/28/planned-parenthood-presidential-debate_n_1923855.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular#slide=1059003
http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/08/29/ann-romney-chris-christie-declare-war-for-the-womens-vote-in-election-2012/
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/highway-2012/campaign-2012-todd-akin-war-on-women-stupid
http://usconservatives.about.com/od/thinkersanddoers/p/Ann-Romney-2012-Game-Changer.htm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/28/planned-parenthood-presidential-debate_n_1923855.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular#slide=1059003
Monday, October 1, 2012
Words
Adage - One of several terms describing short, pithy sayings, or traditional expressions
of conventional wisdom.
Example - "Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
"Count your blessings."
Diaphora - Repetition of a common name so as to perform two logical functions: to designate an individual and to signify the qualities connoted by that individual's name or title.
Girls will be girls.
Orcos- Swearing that a statement is true.
He swore on his own mother's grave that his story was true.
Metonymy - Reference to something or someone by naming one of its attributes
The child ate his dish of vegetables with a scowl on his face.
He gave her a helping hand.
Example - "Don't count your chickens before they hatch.
"Count your blessings."
Diaphora - Repetition of a common name so as to perform two logical functions: to designate an individual and to signify the qualities connoted by that individual's name or title.
Girls will be girls.
Orcos- Swearing that a statement is true.
He swore on his own mother's grave that his story was true.
Metonymy - Reference to something or someone by naming one of its attributes
The child ate his dish of vegetables with a scowl on his face.
He gave her a helping hand.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





